So I decided to look at the rollout maps
There was an inciteful headline in the paper stating that city dwellers will have to bear the costs of the NBN for rural communities - basically saying they will start the infrastructure rollout in the regional areas first. Which of course I think is the right thing to do - why should they start it in the cities when we already have high speed internet? And the poor country folk have dialup and crappy ADSL? I think it will be great for communication as well as education for kids in the country areas - information will be available at fingertips for homes far from access from the services we take for granted - libraries, bookstores, community services. Most of the comments after the article said the same thing - they don't mind if they do the regional areas first. After all, we already have nice broadband here in the city. What would people want with more speed?